Terms of Trade Lawyers Adelaide: Retention of Title, PPSR Registration and Getting Paid

Terms of trade and retention of title in South Australia

Terms of trade decide when a customer must pay, and whether the supplier gets its goods back if the customer fails without paying. Talon Legal drafts and reviews terms of trade, credit applications and retention of title clauses for Adelaide manufacturers, wholesalers, trade suppliers and other businesses that sell on credit, and reviews suppliers’ terms for the businesses that buy from them. Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation or call (08) 7094 2021.


Terms of trade key facts

IssuePosition in South Australia
Retention of titleA security interest, whatever the form of the transaction or who has title (PPSA section 12(1) and (2)(d)).
Against third partiesNeeds writing signed or accepted by the customer that describes the goods, or covers all present and after-acquired property (section 20(1) and (2)).
PerfectionBy registration, once the customer has the goods (section 21(2)).
Purchase money security interest (PMSI) deadlinesInventory: registered by the time the customer obtains possession. Other goods: before the end of 15 business days after. The registration must state it is a PMSI (section 62(2) and (3)).
Customer insolvencyAn unperfected security interest vests in the customer immediately before its winding up, administration, deed of company arrangement, restructuring or bankruptcy (section 267).
Late payment chargesOpen to challenge if out of all proportion to the interests protected (Paciocco v ANZ, Kiefel J (French CJ agreeing) at [29]).
Unfair termsAn unfair term is void in a standard form contract with a consumer or small business (fewer than 100 employees or turnover under $10,000,000) (ACL sections 23 and 24).
Consumer customersGoods must be of acceptable quality, and the guarantees cannot be excluded (sections 54 and 64). For business-type goods, liability can be limited to repair or replacement (section 64A).
Time limitSimple contract claims, such as unpaid invoices: six years (Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) section 35).
First stepSame-day free 30-minute consultation. Call (08) 7094 2021.

Need a terms of trade lawyer in Adelaide?

Our terms of trade lawyers in Adelaide act for suppliers that sell on credit, and for customers reviewing a supplier’s terms. The Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA) decides whether a retention of title clause protects the supplier if a customer becomes insolvent. The Australian Consumer Law (ACL), in Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), decides which terms are void. This page states the law current to 6 November 2026.

This guide is part of our skilled trades and licensed industries practice. Related guides cover deeds of guarantee, equipment and event hire agreements and service agreements and terms of business.

Free Consultation. Send us your terms of trade and credit application. Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation or call (08) 7094 2021.

All reviews
Google
Google
Trustindex
Trustindex
True Local
True Local
Word of mouth
Word of mouth
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
Top Rated Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
5.0Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Top Rated Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
Top Rated Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5
5.0Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5
Top Rated Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5
5.0Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5
Top Rated Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
Posted on Google Google
Muhammad Zubair profile picture
Muhammad Zubair
29 October 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Talon Legal is the best law firm in the Adelaide. Dan was able to resolve my case before time, achieving a favourable outcome. I would highly recommend Talon Legal to anyone seeking professional legal assistance. Talon Legal develops effective legal strategies to achieve the best possible outcomes.
Posted on Google Google
Jessie W profile picture
Jessie W
26 October 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience dealing with Danial at Talon Legal. From our initial conversation, he was professional, approachable and genuinely interested in understanding our business and its needs. He took the time to listen, explain things clearly and offer thoughtful, practical advice. I particularly appreciated his patience, honesty and the time he dedicated to our discussions. Although we haven’t engaged the firm for further work at this stage, the experience has left a very positive impression. I would certainly feel confident reaching out to Danial again for any future legal matters. Thank you, Danial, for your time and professionalism. It’s been a pleasure dealing with you!
Posted on Google Google
Angela Carter profile picture
Angela Carter
12 October 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Was a scary experience, uut thenks to your expertise, i got the best possible outcome.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
S Google profile picture
S Google
24 September 2026
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Exceeds expectations Dan went above and beyond our expectations to deliver professional, highly detailed and very well thought out information. He included extra documents just to help us out and this was much appreciated.
Posted on Google Google
S Google profile picture
S Google
24 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dan went above and beyond our expectations to deliver professional, highly detailed and very well thought out information. He included extra documents just to help us out and this was much appreciated.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
Samin Adit profile picture
Samin Adit
1 September 2026
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Dan was extremely helpful and he was very patient and through and took time explaining me all the process and next step. And he carried a great sense of humor while he spoke and honestly that made it so easy to understand when I was already stressed out.
Posted on Google Google
Calvin Munatswa profile picture
Calvin Munatswa
24 August 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’m extremely happy with the service I received from Dan. He was professional, responsive, knowledgeable and genuinely committed to achieving the best possible outcome. I really appreciate the hard work, guidance and support throughout the process. Thank you for doing such a great job. I would highly recommend your services to anyone looking for a reliable and dedicated lawyer.
Posted on Google Google
Marcelle Ayoubi profile picture
Marcelle Ayoubi
4 August 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Highly recommend Dan! He was prompt, reliable and efficient, with excellent communication throughout the entire process. His knowledge and professionalism gave me confidence, and he achieved a good outcome. Dan took a lot of the stress out of what could have been an overwhelming experience. Thank you, Dan, for all your support and assistance!
Posted on Google Google
Neb Trivic profile picture
Neb Trivic
24 July 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very knowledgable, helpfull and got the best outcome hoped for.
Posted on Google Google
Anton Simdyankin profile picture
Anton Simdyankin
21 July 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Timely quote, responses and overall great experience. 100% Recommend
Posted on Google Google
Tania Stubberfield profile picture
Tania Stubberfield
16 July 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend Talon Legal and especially Daniel Esmaili. During our initial conversation for a driving offence, Dan was incredibly honest and told me that I didn't really need legal representation. He was completely down-to-earth and non-judgmental, reassuring me that people make poor choices sometimes. I felt more at ease and I chose to hire him anyway to avoid the anxiety of a court appearance, and it was the best decision I could have made. He took care of everything from start to finish, appearing in court on my behalf so I didn't have to attend at all. He explained everything clearly without using confusing legal jargon. He was also incredibly thoughtful and personal, asking how my birthday trip away went with family. Thanks to Dan, we got a fantastic outcome with a significantly reduced suspension time and a minimal fine. Dan even went above and beyond by telling me to contact him before I start driving again to double-check that my suspension is fully completed and my licence paperwork is processed correctly. On top of the amazing result, the fees were surprisingly affordable without compromising on performance and integrity. If you want an empathetic, honest, affordable and highly capable lawyer, then Dan's your man. Thankyou again Daniel Esmaili at Talon Legal.
Posted on Google Google
Bill P profile picture
Bill P
30 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We recently engaged Dan Esmaili from Talon Legal to assist our family with a motor vehicle road rule expiation and related court matter. From the very beginning, Dan was professional, clear, and extremely supportive. He took the time to explain the process in a way we could understand, kept us informed throughout, and handled the matter with care and confidence. Most importantly, Dan achieved a successful outcome for our family, which we are very grateful for. We sincerely appreciate his guidance, responsiveness, and dedication. We would highly recommend Dan Esmaili and Talon Legal to anyone needing strong legal support and professional representation.
Posted on Google Google
Sara Gleeson profile picture
Sara Gleeson
16 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I cannot recommend Dan Esmaili (Talon Legal) highly enough. I was extremely worried about the impact a legal problem could have on my future. From the beginning, he was professional, knowledgeable, and supportive. He took the time to explain the legal process, answered all of my questions, and worked tirelessly on my case. Thanks to his expertise and advocacy, I received a result without a conviction being recorded. This outcome has made an enormous difference to my life, and I am incredibly grateful for his dedication and hard work. If you need a lawyer who genuinely cares about their clients and achieves outstanding results, I would not hesitate to recommend Dan.
Posted on Google Google
Matthew Greenwood profile picture
Matthew Greenwood
16 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Thanks Dan for your legal help . You got the best possible outcome , thanks again . Matt
Posted on Google Google
Caleb Sweeting profile picture
Caleb Sweeting
15 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Danial Esmaili is an excellent lawyer whose clear communication style makes navigating legal matters much easier. Professional, approachable and knowledgeable, he takes the time to explain things clearly and provides confidence throughout the process.
Posted on Google Google
Yousef Al-Yasiri profile picture
Yousef Al-Yasiri
11 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Daniel and the team at Talon Legal were truthful, helpful, and left me feeling confident and how they handled my matter. Daniel understood my situation, left me assured, was realistic with me, provided me with the advice or course of action that best suits my sitiation. If I could choose again, I would choose Daniel and the team at Talon Legal with my eyes closed.
Posted on Google Google
Matthew Morgan profile picture
Matthew Morgan
11 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
You’d be hard pressed to find someone more knowledgeable than Dan, a lovely guy too.
Posted on Google Google
Jacob Marcer profile picture
Jacob Marcer
10 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Daniel at talon legal was by far the best lawyer I’ve had to deal with he was extremely helpful with explaining his processes and making me feel very comfortable Also achieving a great result on my case Couldn’t recommend Daniel more if I could give more stars I would Thanks again daniel
Posted on Google Google
Faros Omidvour profile picture
Faros Omidvour
10 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Talon Legal is an excellent law firm that I recpmmend without hesitation to anyone who needs responsive and considerate advice and representation.
Posted on Google Google
Egor Eremeev profile picture
Egor Eremeev
8 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I cannot recommend Talon Legal highly enough. From the very beginning, Daniel demonstrated exceptional professionalism, legal expertise, and genuine care for my situation. Daniel took the time to understand my circumstances, explained every step of the process in clear and practical terms, and was always available to answer questions. His attention to detail, strategic thinking, and calm approach gave me confidence throughout the entire matter. What stood out most was Daniel’s commitment to achieving the best outcome while making the process as smooth and stress-free as possible. It is rare to find a lawyer who combines technical expertise with such excellent client service. Thank you, Daniel, and the Talon Legal team for your outstanding support. I would highly recommend Talon Legal to anyone seeking professional, reliable, and results-driven legal representation.
Posted on Google Google
Kaedehara Kazuha profile picture
Kaedehara Kazuha
4 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We recently engaged Talon Legal to assist with drafting reseller agreements for our business, and the experience exceeded expectations. Dan took the time to understand our requirements, commercial objectives, and the practical realities of our industry before providing clear, strategic advice and a tailored solution. His attention to detail, commercial awareness, and ability to identify potential risks resulted in a comprehensive agreement that gave us confidence moving forward. What stood out most was the firm's proactive and innovative approach. Rather than relying on a standard template, Dan offered practical suggestions and considered scenarios we hadn't even thought of, helping create a robust and well-structured agreement. Talon Legal is a progressive firm with a fresh perspective and a strong understanding of commercial law. Professional, responsive, and easy to work with throughout the process. Highly recommended.
Posted on Google Google
Bec Chapman profile picture
Bec Chapman
22 May 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Talon Legal were exemplary in their service. Dan was concise, thorough and true to the plan. For a small NGO seeking legal advice I can highly recommend :)
Posted on True Local True Local
Hussar1522 profile picture
Hussar1522
29 October 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
One of the best lawyers in Adelaide My life was being ruined because of a court case that was not true, then it became worse when I have driving charge for driving disqualification and careless driving with an accident that I did not cause. This affect my business and the lawyers protected my business and my life and reputation. They make the charges go away and I get no conviction or criminal record, and do my business contracts terms and conditions perfectly. If you want lawyers that can help you many ways I suggest you go to Talon Legal. I think one of the best law firms in Adelaide for business and criminal and traffic.
Posted on True Local True Local
Oldpicker64 profile picture
Oldpicker64
17 August 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Saved me from jail for disqualified driving I can’t thank talon legal enough for what they did to help when I had magistrates court in port adelaide and Elizabeth, lost my licence because I was sick before and had to drive in emergency to help family but police didn’t care. Talon legal helped me with disqualified driving charges in court and saved me from going back to jail this was the one time I liked working with a lawyer. Recommend talon legal for any legal problem.
Posted on True Local True Local
J420 profile picture
J420
2 August 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Best criminal lawyers! I hired talon legal to fight a criminal case for me and they got the charge dropped. Daniel was amazing in handling my case. He actually cared about my case and me as a person. I felt really supported and I am glad I got talon legal for my court case. Best criminal lawyers in Adelaide that I spoke to.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
James Aveno profile picture
James Aveno
2 August 2025
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Excellent business and startup lawyers Talon Legal was incredible to work with and delivered outstanding value for money and expertise. I went into my initial meeting expecting to receive some basic information instead I was blown away by their depth of knowledge across multiple domains. I was in the process of founding a startup business in Adelaide, and explained my goal of expanding interstate and eventually internationally. The lawyer I spoke to was across contracts, terms and conditions, intellectual property protection and licensing, brand consolidation, risk minimisation and business structures and compliant advertising. I was really impressed however by their use of ingenious tools that aren’t really the domain of lawyers at least from what I’ve seen before. Daniel in particular was a bit of wizard. He walked me through how something called OSINT could be used for brand consolidation and was very transparent about the use of some of their document automation tools, and this reflected in the speed and value they provided. I really felt like I finally am able to work with a law firm that can help me with every stage of my business and was genuinely curious about what what I wanted to achieve. Even after the services were provided, Talon Legal was proactive in checking in with me to ensure my business was prospering. I have sent my friends and other entrepreneurs to them and every single one was very happy.
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
James A profile picture
James A
2 August 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Excellent commercial and business lawyers! Talon Legal was incredible to work with and delivered outstanding value for money and expertise. I went into my initial meeting expecting to receive some basic information instead I was blown away by their depth of knowledge across multiple domains. I was in the process of founding a startup business in Adelaide, and explained my goal of expanding interstate and eventually internationally. The lawyer I spoke to was across contracts, terms and conditions, intellectual property protection and licensing, brand consolidation, risk minimisation and business structures and compliant advertising. I was really impressed however by their use of ingenious tools that aren’t really the domain of lawyers at least from what I’ve seen before. Daniel in particular was a bit of wizard. He walked me through how something called OSINT could be used for brand consolidation and was very transparent about the use of some of their document automation tools, and this reflected in the speed and value they provided. I really felt like I finally am able to work with a law firm that can help me with every stage of my business and was genuinely curious about what what I wanted to achieve. Even after the services were provided, Talon Legal was proactive in checking in with me to ensure my business was prospering. I have sent my friends and other entrepreneurs to them and every single one was very happy. Approximate cost: $4500
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
DP123 profile picture
DP123
12 July 2025
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Clear advice in a very stressful time I was in a very stressful situation and Talon Legal fixed my problem - now my stress is gone! Very professional, excellent communication, accessible and fast. Thank you for everything.
Posted on True Local True Local
Slavi77 profile picture
Slavi77
12 July 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
They won my hardship appeal Was about to lose my licence and Talon Legal got it back. Made a promise and kept it. This is what a lawyer should be like. Helped me with my driving disqualification and other driving offences. Very prepared and explaining things very good so I could understand them easily.
Posted on True Local True Local
Emir profile picture
Emir
2 July 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Very good criminal lawyer They were honest and did what they said they would do and told me what to expect it was like following a map and I felt safe because I know what to expect very happy with the experience Talon. If I need lawyer again I will come back.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
Samsun profile picture
Samsun
28 June 2025
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Got the best result for me Easy to deal with and spoke to me in normal English, explained everything really good to me, didn’t go over agreed budget to help with my case and communicated all the time with me, never kept me waiting and very responsive to my questions, had direct access to my lawyer anytime I needed. Got very good result for my case for drinking and driving, disqualified driving, demerit points and provisional driver licence condition
Posted on True Local True Local
Rogue33 profile picture
Rogue33
26 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Very good experience best money ever spent on a lawyer Professional, friendly and fixed fee service. I had some charges in court in Adelaide and Talon Legal completely picked apart the case against me. Charges were removed and I got my licence back too. Cant recommend them strongly enough. Really easy to work with and friendly. Thanks for wining my licence appeal and getting the drink driving charges removed.
Posted on True Local True Local
Riggo7 profile picture
Riggo7
24 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Saved my drivers license Can’t thank the team enough at Talon Legal for helping me keep my drivers license. They were very knowledgeable and took the time to explain everything to me every step of the way. If it wasn’t for their excellent representation in court I would have lost my license. They left no stone unturned. Highly recommend.
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
Karen R. profile picture
Karen R.
24 June 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Best lawyers for traffic offences in adelaide Really appreciate Talon Legal’s help to keep my license, thank you so much to the team. Professional, responsive and compassionate service from everyone at the office and excellent outcome. Would definitely recommend. Approximate cost: $2800
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
Les A. profile picture
Les A.
23 June 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Excellent traffic lawyers I owe them my life and job words are not enough to say how thankful i am for the help they gave me when i was going to lose the driver licence in magistrates court because of drink driving and drug driving. Approximate cost: $3000
Posted on True Local True Local
Jordan profile picture
Jordan
22 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Best Lawyers! Absolutely first-class service from Talon Legal. I had a complicated traffic matter and wasn’t sure where to turn. From the first phone call, they were professional, understanding, and gave me clear advice without the legal jargon. On the day of court, they were calm and prepared and the result spoke for itself. I’m so grateful for their help and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend them to anyone needing help with a traffic offence.
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
S A. profile picture
S A.
17 June 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Brilliant traffic lawyers in adelaide Helped me get my licence back in the magistrates court after I applied for a licence appeal because I breached my provisional conditions. Made it straightforward and helped me stay calm. Treated me like a normal person and was very compassionate. You saved my job legends Approximate cost: $1800
Posted on True Local True Local
SA profile picture
SA
16 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Successful drivers licence appeal! Made the process really easy for me to understand and helped me appeal my licence in the magistrates after it was disqualified for breaching a licence condition. Thank you legends, I would have been stuffed if I lost my licence without you guns!
Posted on True Local True Local
TK profile picture
TK
5 April 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Best traffic lawyers in Adelaide I came across talon legal when I was looking for a law firm in Adelaide to represent me for traffic offences while visiting from overseas. They were very professional, fast, friendly and down to earth. Dan handled my mater and got me a very good outcome at a fixed cost.

What should terms of trade cover?

Everything about how the supplier sells on credit, usually in these parts.

  • The credit application, the credit limit and the customer’s signed acceptance.
  • Price, payment dates, interest, recovery costs and the right to stop supply.
  • Retention of title, with risk usually passing on delivery.
  • A PPSA clause that lets the supplier register and requires the customer’s cooperation.
  • A director’s guarantee where the customer is a company.
  • Defects, limits on liability and disputes.

A person who signs a document known to contain contractual terms and to affect legal relations is generally bound by them, read or not. That is so absent a vitiating element or a claim for equitable or statutory relief (Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52 at [57]).

A terms of trade lawyer will also check whether the retention of title clause is registered, and whether the unfair terms law applies.


What should the credit application and payment terms say?

The credit application should record the customer’s exact legal name, ABN or ACN, its directors or owners, and its acceptance of the terms for every supply. A company customer should sign in a way the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) recognises, such as by two directors, or a director and a company secretary (section 127(1)).

The payment terms should state when each invoice is due, and give the supplier a right to suspend supply while an invoice is overdue. Disputed amounts should be withheld only through the dispute process, subject to consumer guarantee rights.

In AIBI Holdings Pty Ltd v Virtual Technology Services Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 696, a customer of an IT services provider withheld payment in a dispute over service quality and extra charges ([2]). The contract allowed disputed amounts to be withheld only once its dispute process had been activated. It had not been, so the invoices were payable in full ([137] to [139]). The provider had suspended helpdesk services in reliance on a clause allowing it to withhold services if invoices went unpaid ([2]), and that was not a breach ([140]).


Can a supplier charge interest and late fees?

Yes, if the terms the customer accepted provide for them. A fee that first appears on an overdue invoice is much harder to justify.

A charge on default can be challenged as a penalty. In Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28, Kiefel J, with whom French CJ agreed, stated the question. It is whether a provision for payment of a sum on default is out of all proportion to the interests of the party which it is the purpose of the provision to protect, which may be of a business or financial nature ([29]).

A rate or fee based on the supplier’s real costs is easier to defend. In a standard form consumer or small business contract, a term that penalises only the customer for breach or termination is also a statutory example of a term that may be unfair (ACL section 25(c)).


Should directors guarantee the account?

Where the customer is a company, usually yes. A director’s guarantee gives the supplier someone to pursue if the company does not pay. A separate guarantee signed by each director is clearer than one buried in the credit application.

If the guarantee is executed as a deed, a natural person’s execution must be attested by at least one witness who is not a party (Law of Property Act 1936 (SA) section 41(2)(a)). A defectively executed deed can still be valid if external evidence shows the party intended to be bound (section 41(4)). See the deeds of guarantee guide.


How does retention of title work under the PPSA?

Ownership stays with the supplier until it is paid, and the PPSA treats that as security. A security interest is an interest in personal property provided for by a transaction that, in substance, secures payment or performance of an obligation. That is so without regard to the form of the transaction or who has title (PPSA section 12(1)). The examples include an agreement to sell subject to retention of title (section 12(2)(d)). Holding title does not, by itself, protect the supplier.

To bind third parties, the interest must have attached and be covered by a security agreement as section 20(2) requires (section 20(1)). The alternatives are possession or control, and a supplier that has delivered the goods no longer has possession.

Section 20(2) needs writing signed by the customer, or adopted or accepted by its act or omission. The writing must describe the particular goods, or state that it covers all present and after-acquired property. Signing includes applying a symbol, or encrypted writing, with intent to identify and adopt (section 20(3)).

So the clause belongs in the terms the customer signs or clearly accepts, and should describe the goods. One printed only on an invoice sent after delivery invites the argument that the customer never agreed to it.


Why register on the PPSR, and when?

Registration perfects the interest and decides priority. A security interest is perfected if it has attached, is enforceable against third parties and one more condition is met. Either a registration is effective with respect to the collateral, or the secured party has possession (other than by seizure or repossession) or, for some kinds of property, control (section 21(1) and (2)). Once the customer has the goods, registration on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) is the practical route.

A supplier can rank ahead of the customer’s bank with a purchase money security interest (PMSI). A PMSI includes a security interest in collateral to the extent it secures all or part of its purchase price (section 14(1)(a)). An “all moneys” clause, which keeps title until every debt is paid, is a PMSI only to that extent. The deadlines are strict.

  • For inventory, the PMSI must be perfected by registration at the time the customer obtains possession (section 62(2)).
  • For other goods, it must be perfected by registration before the end of 15 business days after the customer obtains possession (section 62(3)). A court can extend the period under section 293 (section 62, note).
  • Either way, the registration must state that it is a PMSI.

If the conditions are met, the PMSI has priority over a non-PMSI security interest granted by the same customer. If they are missed, that priority is lost, though the interest is still perfected. The safe practice is to register before the first delivery, which meets both deadlines.

A security interest is not a PMSI if, when it attaches, the customer intends to use the goods predominantly for personal, domestic or household purposes (section 14(2)(c), which is subject to section 14(2A)).


What happens if the customer becomes insolvent?

An unperfected interest is lost. Section 267 applies when a company is wound up, an administrator is appointed, a deed of company arrangement is executed or a restructuring practitioner is appointed, or a person becomes bankrupt. A security interest the company or person granted, and that is unperfected at the relevant time, vests in the grantor immediately before the event (section 267(1) and (2)). The supplier is left with a claim for the price as an unsecured creditor, and with any guarantee it took.

A perfected interest is not caught by section 267, and the supplier can claim the goods that remain, subject to priority. A supplier with a failing customer should get advice first.


Which terms can be unfair to a small business customer?

An unfair term of a consumer or small business contract is void if the contract is a standard form contract (ACL section 23(1)). A contract for the supply of goods or services is a small business contract if at least one party employs fewer than 100 persons, or had turnover under $10,000,000 for its last income year (section 23(4)). A contract alleged to be standard form is presumed to be one unless another party proves otherwise (section 27(1)).

A term is unfair if it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations, is not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the party it advantages, and would cause detriment if applied or relied on (section 24(1)). The party a term advantages, usually the supplier, must prove it is reasonably necessary (section 24(4)).

Statutory examples of terms that may be unfair include terms that penalise only the customer for breach or termination (section 25(c)), or let only the supplier vary the terms (section 25(d)). So do terms letting the supplier vary the upfront price without the customer having a right to terminate (section 25(f)).

In ACCC v JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1224, the Court declared, on agreed facts, that eight terms of small business standard form contracts were unfair and void. The Court accepted that a term letting prices rise for any reason, with no right for the customer to terminate or obtain a change of scope or a lower price, caused a significant imbalance ([56](b)). So did an unlimited indemnity that applied even where the loss was not the customer’s fault ([56](g)). At that time an unfair term was void but not penalised.

Since 9 November 2023, making a standard form consumer or small business contract containing an unfair term the supplier proposed, or applying or relying on one, is a contravention, and each term counts separately (section 23(2A) to (2C)). The maximum penalty for a body corporate is the greater of $100,000,000 and three times the benefit or, if that cannot be determined, 30% of adjusted turnover during the breach turnover period. For anyone else it is $2,500,000 (section 224(3) and (3A)).


What changes when the customer is a consumer?

The consumer guarantees apply. A person acquires goods as a consumer if the amount paid or payable did not exceed $100,000 (ACL section 3(1)(a); regulation 77A of the Competition and Consumer Regulations 2010), so many business customers qualify. A person is not a consumer of goods acquired for re-supply, or to use up or transform in trade or commerce in production or manufacture, or in repairing or treating other goods or fixtures (section 3(2)).

Goods supplied to a consumer, other than by auction, must be of acceptable quality (section 54). A term is void to the extent it purports to exclude, restrict or modify a guarantee, or has that effect (section 64(1)). For goods not of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use, liability may be limited to replacing or repairing the goods, or the cost of doing so, except for sections 51 to 53 (section 64A(1)). The limit does not apply if the consumer establishes that relying on it would not be fair or reasonable (section 64A(3)).

Many terms of trade deem goods accepted unless faults are reported soon after delivery. In ACCC v Booktopia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 194, Booktopia admitted liability. It accepted that a website term requiring consumers to report incorrect, damaged or faulty items within 2 business days of delivery represented that they had to do so to have a remedy ([15], [18]). A $6,000,000 penalty was ordered for the section 29(1)(m) contraventions. A deemed acceptance clause should apply only to customers who are not consumers.


What should a buyer’s purchasing terms say?

Larger customers send their own terms with each purchase order. These typically require goods to meet the specification and arrive on time, keep risk with the supplier until acceptance, and require insurance and an indemnity for the supplier’s negligence. A buyer acquiring goods for re-supply, or to transform in manufacture, is not a consumer (section 3(2)), so the guarantees will not protect it and its contract has to set the standard.

When both sides have standard terms, which set governs depends on how each contract was formed. A credit application signed by the buyer, accepting the supplier’s terms for every supply, is strong evidence for the supplier (Toll v Alphapharm at [57]). If the supplier’s terms keep title until it is paid, it holds a security interest in goods in the buyer’s hands (PPSA section 12(2)(d)).

Buyers should check their own terms too. The small business test is met if at least one party, including the supplier, employs fewer than 100 persons or has turnover under $10,000,000 (ACL section 23(4)). A right for the buyer alone to cancel orders at any time, for no reason, is a statutory example of a term that may be unfair (section 25(b)).


How similar matters tend to play out

Illustrations of how the law on this page combines on ordinary facts, not predictions. Outcome depends on the documents, the evidence and the court.

Lower range. A homewares retailer withholds a $9,000 invoice, saying part of the delivery was damaged. Its wholesaler’s terms allow disputed amounts to be withheld only after a dispute notice, which was never given. On terms like those in AIBI, the invoice is payable ([137] to [139]). The retailer bought for re-supply, so it is not a consumer (section 3(2)).

Middle range. An equipment supplier sells a $60,000 machine for use in a customer’s factory, retaining title, and registers 20 business days after delivery. The customer’s bank already holds security over all its assets. The supplier is perfected, so section 267 will not vest its interest in the customer. But it missed the 15 business day window, and with it the priority over the bank that section 62(3) gives.

Upper range. A building products supplier sold to a builder on account for years, retaining title but never registering. The builder’s company is wound up owing $180,000, with the supplier’s stock still on its sites. The unperfected interest vests in the company immediately before the winding up (section 267), leaving the supplier unsecured. Its best asset is the director’s guarantee, if properly executed.


How we act on terms of trade

Our terms of trade lawyers act for suppliers that sell on credit and for the businesses that buy from them. For a supplier, the aim is terms that get it paid and security that holds if a customer fails. For a buyer, it is clear standards.

StageWhat happensWhat we do
Set-upThe supplier prepares to open accounts.Draft the terms, credit application and guarantee, and check them against the unfair terms law.
SecurityGoods go out on credit.Advise on registration and PMSI timing, and on registering before delivery.
CollectionAn invoice is overdue.Draft the demand, apply interest and costs as the terms allow, and call on any guarantee.
InsolvencyA customer fails.Advise on the security interest, recovering goods and the guarantee.
ReviewProducts, customers or the law change.Update the terms and the registration process.

We cannot promise an outcome, and no lawyer can. We can make sure your terms, guarantees and registrations are in place before a customer fails.

Every hour matters. Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation, or call (08) 7094 2021 now.


Terms of trade case law

None of the decisions below concerned retention of title or the PPSA; each decided a point that applies to terms of trade.

CaseCourtPrinciplePinpoint
Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52High CourtA signed contractual document binds, read or not[57]
AIBI Holdings Pty Ltd v Virtual Technology Services Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 696Federal CourtDisputed invoices withheld only through the dispute process[2], [137] to [140]
Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28High CourtTest for a sum payable on default[29]
ACCC v JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1224Federal CourtPrice variation and indemnity terms unfair[56], [57]
ACCC v Booktopia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 194Federal CourtShort notification term misrepresented consumer rights[15], [18]

Case notes

Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52

The joint reasons stated the general rule that a person who signs a document known to contain contractual terms and to affect legal relations is bound by them, read or not, absent a vitiating element or a claim for equitable or statutory relief ([57]).

AIBI Holdings Pty Ltd v Virtual Technology Services Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 696

Because the contract’s dispute process had not been activated, invoices the customer withheld were payable in full, and the provider’s suspension of its helpdesk was not a breach ([137] to [140]). The application was dismissed.

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28

Kiefel J, with whom French CJ agreed, asked whether a provision for payment of a sum on default is out of all proportion to the interests it is intended to protect ([29]). Both appeals were dismissed with costs.

ACCC v JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1224

On agreed facts, Moshinsky J declared eight terms of small business standard form contracts unfair and void, accepting that the price variation and indemnity terms caused a significant imbalance ([56]) and that the supplier bore the onus under section 24(4) ([57]).

ACCC v Booktopia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 194

Booktopia admitted liability and accepted that its 2 business day notification term represented that consumers had to notify within that time to have a remedy ([15], [18]). Burley J ordered a $6,000,000 penalty for the section 29(1)(m) contraventions.


Frequently asked questions

What are terms of trade?

The standard terms on which a supplier sells to its customers, usually accepted through a signed credit application.

Does a retention of title clause protect a supplier?

Not on the customer’s insolvency unless it is perfected. Retention of title is a security interest (PPSA section 12(2)(d)), and an unperfected one vests in the customer if it is wound up, enters administration or becomes bankrupt (section 267).

Do I need to register on the PPSR?

In practice, yes. Registration perfects a retention of title interest once the customer has the goods (section 21), and an unperfected interest is lost on the customer’s insolvency (section 267).

How long does a supplier have to register a PMSI?

For inventory, by the time the customer obtains possession. For other goods, before the end of 15 business days after it obtains possession. The registration must state that it is a PMSI (section 62(2) and (3)).

Can a supplier charge interest on overdue invoices?

Yes, if the terms provide for it. A charge payable on default that is out of all proportion to the interests it protects is open to challenge (Paciocco v ANZ, Kiefel J at [29]).

Should a supplier ask directors for a personal guarantee?

Where the customer is a company, usually yes. If signed as a deed, a natural person’s execution must be attested by at least one witness who is not a party (Law of Property Act 1936 (SA) section 41(2)(a)).

Can a customer withhold payment because some goods were faulty?

Only as the terms and the law allow. A consumer’s guarantee rights cannot be excluded (ACL section 64(1)). In AIBI, disputed invoices were payable because the dispute process had not been activated ([137] to [139]).

Are terms of trade covered by the unfair contract terms law?

Yes, where they form a standard form contract with a consumer or small business. An unfair term is void (ACL section 23(1)), and since 9 November 2023 proposing or relying on one is a contravention (section 23(2A) and (2C)).

How long does a supplier have to sue for an unpaid invoice?

Six years. An action founded on simple contract must be commenced within six years after the cause of action accrued (Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) section 35).

Do I need a terms of trade lawyer?

For any business that sells on credit, yes. A terms of trade lawyer can set up the terms, credit application, guarantee and registration process so they hold up when a customer fails. A free 30-minute consultation will tell you where you stand.


Talon Legal Insights

Access hundreds of legal precedents and templates.

When you partner with us, you also gain access to a vast repository of regularly updated and ever-expanding legal resources.