Speeding Offences SA: Fines, Demerit Points and Losing Your Licence

Speeding offences in South Australia

A speeding notice in South Australia carries an expiation fee of $215 to $1,793 and 2 to 7 demerit points, and driving 45 km/h or more over the limit can bring an immediate police licence suspension and, on conviction, a disqualification of at least 6 months. Talon Legal advises drivers on speeding notices and defends speeding charges in Magistrates Courts across South Australia. Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation or call (08) 7094 2021.


Speeding offences key facts

IssuePosition in South Australia
Governing lawRule 20 of the Australian Road Rules; the Road Traffic Act 1961 (SA); section 19ADA of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA); the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 (SA). Current to 7 November 2026.
The offenceDriving over the speed limit applying to the driver for the length of road (rule 20).
Less than 10 km/h overExpiation fee $215; 2 demerit points.
10 km/h or more but less than 20 km/h overExpiation fee $484; 3 demerit points.
20 km/h or more but less than 30 km/h overExpiation fee $987; 5 demerit points.
30 km/h or more overExpiation fee $1,793; 7 demerit points.
45 km/h or more overExcessive speed (section 45A): $2,018; 9 demerit points; a police suspension of up to 6 months; on conviction, at least 6 months disqualification.
Extreme speed55 km/h or more over a limit of 60 km/h or less, or 80 km/h or more over a higher limit (section 19ADA): up to 3 years imprisonment, or 5 if aggravated; on conviction, at least 2 years disqualification.
Court maximumA fine of up to $5,000 for a speeding offence under the Australian Road Rules (regulation 67(a)).
Demerit points12 or more for offences within 3 years: a disqualification of 3, 4 or 5 months, or a 12 month good behaviour election (sections 98BC and 98BE of the Motor Vehicles Act).
Learners and P-platers10 km/h or more over a limit, or 4 demerit points (2 on a probationary licence): a 6 month disqualification and cancellation (section 81B). A provisional licence holder may be able to enter a Safer Driver Agreement instead, but not for an offence carrying 4 or more demerit points (section 81BA).
Time to pay28 days from, and including, the date of the notice (section 6(1)(c) of the Expiation of Offences Act 1996 (SA)).
First stepSame-day free 30-minute consultation. Call (08) 7094 2021.

Charged with a speeding offence? What the law says

The basic speeding offence is rule 20 of the Australian Road Rules. Higher speeds bring separate offences: excessive speed, at 45 km/h or more over the limit, under section 45A of the Road Traffic Act 1961 (SA), and extreme speed under section 19ADA of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA). This guide sets out speeding offences SA law in one place: how the limit is set, the fees and demerit points, camera notices, the options on a notice, the rules for learners and P-platers, and when police can take a licence on the spot. It states the law current to 7 November 2026.

Fees and levies on this page are those in force from 1 July 2026, and demerit points are those in Schedule 4 of the Motor Vehicles Regulations 2025.

Free Consultation. Paying a notice brings the demerit points with it, so advice is best taken before the 28 days run out. Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation or call (08) 7094 2021.

Speeding guides

All reviews
Google
Google
Trustindex
Trustindex
True Local
True Local
Word of mouth
Word of mouth
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Licence Appeal Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
5.0Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Licence Appeal Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
5.0Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Licence Appeal Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5
5.0Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Licence Appeal Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
5.0Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5
5.0Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
Verified by Trustindex
Top Rated Licence Appeal Lawyers
  • 5.0 Excellent rating Last 12 months
  • New reviews collected regularly Recent review activity detected
  • Leading Licence Appeal Lawyers Google Maps rating and review data
  • Verified by Trustindex Based on real customer reviews Learn more
Posted on Google Google
Muhammad Zubair
29 October 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Talon Legal is the best law firm in the Adelaide. Dan was able to resolve my case before time, achieving a favourable outcome. I would highly recommend Talon Legal to anyone seeking professional legal assistance. Talon Legal develops effective legal strategies to achieve the best possible outcomes.
Posted on Google Google
Jessie W
26 October 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience dealing with Danial at Talon Legal. From our initial conversation, he was professional, approachable and genuinely interested in understanding our business and its needs. He took the time to listen, explain things clearly and offer thoughtful, practical advice. I particularly appreciated his patience, honesty and the time he dedicated to our discussions. Although we haven’t engaged the firm for further work at this stage, the experience has left a very positive impression. I would certainly feel confident reaching out to Danial again for any future legal matters. Thank you, Danial, for your time and professionalism. It’s been a pleasure dealing with you!
Posted on Google Google
Angela Carter
12 October 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Was a scary experience, uut thenks to your expertise, i got the best possible outcome.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
S Google
24 September 2026
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Exceeds expectations Dan went above and beyond our expectations to deliver professional, highly detailed and very well thought out information. He included extra documents just to help us out and this was much appreciated.
Posted on Google Google
S Google
24 September 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dan went above and beyond our expectations to deliver professional, highly detailed and very well thought out information. He included extra documents just to help us out and this was much appreciated.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
Samin Adit
1 September 2026
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Dan was extremely helpful and he was very patient and through and took time explaining me all the process and next step. And he carried a great sense of humor while he spoke and honestly that made it so easy to understand when I was already stressed out.
Posted on Google Google
Calvin Munatswa
24 August 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I’m extremely happy with the service I received from Dan. He was professional, responsive, knowledgeable and genuinely committed to achieving the best possible outcome. I really appreciate the hard work, guidance and support throughout the process. Thank you for doing such a great job. I would highly recommend your services to anyone looking for a reliable and dedicated lawyer.
Posted on Google Google
Marcelle Ayoubi
4 August 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Highly recommend Dan! He was prompt, reliable and efficient, with excellent communication throughout the entire process. His knowledge and professionalism gave me confidence, and he achieved a good outcome. Dan took a lot of the stress out of what could have been an overwhelming experience. Thank you, Dan, for all your support and assistance!
Posted on Google Google
Neb Trivic
24 July 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very knowledgable, helpfull and got the best outcome hoped for.
Posted on Google Google
Anton Simdyankin
21 July 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Timely quote, responses and overall great experience. 100% Recommend
Posted on Google Google
Tania Stubberfield
16 July 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend Talon Legal and especially Daniel Esmaili. During our initial conversation for a driving offence, Dan was incredibly honest and told me that I didn't really need legal representation. He was completely down-to-earth and non-judgmental, reassuring me that people make poor choices sometimes. I felt more at ease and I chose to hire him anyway to avoid the anxiety of a court appearance, and it was the best decision I could have made. He took care of everything from start to finish, appearing in court on my behalf so I didn't have to attend at all. He explained everything clearly without using confusing legal jargon. He was also incredibly thoughtful and personal, asking how my birthday trip away went with family. Thanks to Dan, we got a fantastic outcome with a significantly reduced suspension time and a minimal fine. Dan even went above and beyond by telling me to contact him before I start driving again to double-check that my suspension is fully completed and my licence paperwork is processed correctly. On top of the amazing result, the fees were surprisingly affordable without compromising on performance and integrity. If you want an empathetic, honest, affordable and highly capable lawyer, then Dan's your man. Thankyou again Daniel Esmaili at Talon Legal.
Posted on Google Google
Bill P
30 June 2026
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We recently engaged Dan Esmaili from Talon Legal to assist our family with a motor vehicle road rule expiation and related court matter. From the very beginning, Dan was professional, clear, and extremely supportive. He took the time to explain the process in a way we could understand, kept us informed throughout, and handled the matter with care and confidence. Most importantly, Dan achieved a successful outcome for our family, which we are very grateful for. We sincerely appreciate his guidance, responsiveness, and dedication. We would highly recommend Dan Esmaili and Talon Legal to anyone needing strong legal support and professional representation.
Posted on True Local True Local
Hussar1522
29 October 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
One of the best lawyers in Adelaide My life was being ruined because of a court case that was not true, then it became worse when I have driving charge for driving disqualification and careless driving with an accident that I did not cause. This affect my business and the lawyers protected my business and my life and reputation. They make the charges go away and I get no conviction or criminal record, and do my business contracts terms and conditions perfectly. If you want lawyers that can help you many ways I suggest you go to Talon Legal. I think one of the best law firms in Adelaide for business and criminal and traffic.
Posted on True Local True Local
Oldpicker64
17 August 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Saved me from jail for disqualified driving I can’t thank talon legal enough for what they did to help when I had magistrates court in port adelaide and Elizabeth, lost my licence because I was sick before and had to drive in emergency to help family but police didn’t care. Talon legal helped me with disqualified driving charges in court and saved me from going back to jail this was the one time I liked working with a lawyer. Recommend talon legal for any legal problem.
Posted on True Local True Local
J420
2 August 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Best criminal lawyers! I hired talon legal to fight a criminal case for me and they got the charge dropped. Daniel was amazing in handling my case. He actually cared about my case and me as a person. I felt really supported and I am glad I got talon legal for my court case. Best criminal lawyers in Adelaide that I spoke to.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
James Aveno
2 August 2025
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Excellent business and startup lawyers Talon Legal was incredible to work with and delivered outstanding value for money and expertise. I went into my initial meeting expecting to receive some basic information instead I was blown away by their depth of knowledge across multiple domains. I was in the process of founding a startup business in Adelaide, and explained my goal of expanding interstate and eventually internationally. The lawyer I spoke to was across contracts, terms and conditions, intellectual property protection and licensing, brand consolidation, risk minimisation and business structures and compliant advertising. I was really impressed however by their use of ingenious tools that aren’t really the domain of lawyers at least from what I’ve seen before. Daniel in particular was a bit of wizard. He walked me through how something called OSINT could be used for brand consolidation and was very transparent about the use of some of their document automation tools, and this reflected in the speed and value they provided. I really felt like I finally am able to work with a law firm that can help me with every stage of my business and was genuinely curious about what what I wanted to achieve. Even after the services were provided, Talon Legal was proactive in checking in with me to ensure my business was prospering. I have sent my friends and other entrepreneurs to them and every single one was very happy.
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
James A
2 August 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Excellent commercial and business lawyers! Talon Legal was incredible to work with and delivered outstanding value for money and expertise. I went into my initial meeting expecting to receive some basic information instead I was blown away by their depth of knowledge across multiple domains. I was in the process of founding a startup business in Adelaide, and explained my goal of expanding interstate and eventually internationally. The lawyer I spoke to was across contracts, terms and conditions, intellectual property protection and licensing, brand consolidation, risk minimisation and business structures and compliant advertising. I was really impressed however by their use of ingenious tools that aren’t really the domain of lawyers at least from what I’ve seen before. Daniel in particular was a bit of wizard. He walked me through how something called OSINT could be used for brand consolidation and was very transparent about the use of some of their document automation tools, and this reflected in the speed and value they provided. I really felt like I finally am able to work with a law firm that can help me with every stage of my business and was genuinely curious about what what I wanted to achieve. Even after the services were provided, Talon Legal was proactive in checking in with me to ensure my business was prospering. I have sent my friends and other entrepreneurs to them and every single one was very happy. Approximate cost: $4500
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
DP123
12 July 2025
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Clear advice in a very stressful time I was in a very stressful situation and Talon Legal fixed my problem - now my stress is gone! Very professional, excellent communication, accessible and fast. Thank you for everything.
Posted on True Local True Local
Slavi77
12 July 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
They won my hardship appeal Was about to lose my licence and Talon Legal got it back. Made a promise and kept it. This is what a lawyer should be like. Helped me with my driving disqualification and other driving offences. Very prepared and explaining things very good so I could understand them easily.
Posted on True Local True Local
Emir
2 July 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Very good criminal lawyer They were honest and did what they said they would do and told me what to expect it was like following a map and I felt safe because I know what to expect very happy with the experience Talon. If I need lawyer again I will come back.
Posted on Trustindex Trustindex
Samsun
28 June 2025
Trustindex star 1Trustindex star 2Trustindex star 3Trustindex star 4Trustindex star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Trustindex.
Got the best result for me Easy to deal with and spoke to me in normal English, explained everything really good to me, didn’t go over agreed budget to help with my case and communicated all the time with me, never kept me waiting and very responsive to my questions, had direct access to my lawyer anytime I needed. Got very good result for my case for drinking and driving, disqualified driving, demerit points and provisional driver licence condition
Posted on True Local True Local
Rogue33
26 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Very good experience best money ever spent on a lawyer Professional, friendly and fixed fee service. I had some charges in court in Adelaide and Talon Legal completely picked apart the case against me. Charges were removed and I got my licence back too. Cant recommend them strongly enough. Really easy to work with and friendly. Thanks for wining my licence appeal and getting the drink driving charges removed.
Posted on True Local True Local
Riggo7
24 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Saved my drivers license Can’t thank the team enough at Talon Legal for helping me keep my drivers license. They were very knowledgeable and took the time to explain everything to me every step of the way. If it wasn’t for their excellent representation in court I would have lost my license. They left no stone unturned. Highly recommend.
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
Karen R.
24 June 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Best lawyers for traffic offences in adelaide Really appreciate Talon Legal’s help to keep my license, thank you so much to the team. Professional, responsive and compassionate service from everyone at the office and excellent outcome. Would definitely recommend. Approximate cost: $2800
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
Les A.
23 June 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Excellent traffic lawyers I owe them my life and job words are not enough to say how thankful i am for the help they gave me when i was going to lose the driver licence in magistrates court because of drink driving and drug driving. Approximate cost: $3000
Posted on True Local True Local
Jordan
22 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Best Lawyers! Absolutely first-class service from Talon Legal. I had a complicated traffic matter and wasn’t sure where to turn. From the first phone call, they were professional, understanding, and gave me clear advice without the legal jargon. On the day of court, they were calm and prepared and the result spoke for itself. I’m so grateful for their help and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend them to anyone needing help with a traffic offence.
Posted on Word of mouth Word of mouth
S A.
17 June 2025
Wordofmouth star 1Wordofmouth star 2Wordofmouth star 3Wordofmouth star 4Wordofmouth star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Word of mouth.
Brilliant traffic lawyers in adelaide Helped me get my licence back in the magistrates court after I applied for a licence appeal because I breached my provisional conditions. Made it straightforward and helped me stay calm. Treated me like a normal person and was very compassionate. You saved my job legends Approximate cost: $1800
Posted on True Local True Local
SA
16 June 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Successful drivers licence appeal! Made the process really easy for me to understand and helped me appeal my licence in the magistrates after it was disqualified for breaching a licence condition. Thank you legends, I would have been stuffed if I lost my licence without you guns!
Posted on True Local True Local
TK
5 April 2025
Truelocal star 1Truelocal star 2Truelocal star 3Truelocal star 4Truelocal star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is True Local.
Best traffic lawyers in Adelaide I came across talon legal when I was looking for a law firm in Adelaide to represent me for traffic offences while visiting from overseas. They were very professional, fast, friendly and down to earth. Dan handled my mater and got me a very good outcome at a fixed cost.

What counts as speeding in South Australia?

Speeding is driving faster than the speed limit that applies to the driver on the length of road being driven. Rule 20 says: “A driver must not drive at a speed over the speed limit applying to the driver for the length of road where the driver is driving.” The Australian Road Rules are made under section 80 of the Road Traffic Act.

The rule applies however the speed is detected. In Police v Young [2012] SASC 210, the Supreme Court held that rule 20 is not limited to offences detected by photographic equipment ([121] to [125]). The Road Traffic Act makes certificates about speedometers, cameras and other speed analysers proof of their accuracy unless the contrary is proved (section 175(3)), and an average speed camera reading is conclusively presumed to be the vehicle’s actual speed along the whole route (section 175A).


How is the speed limit set?

The limit is the one shown on a speed limit sign, or set for a speed limited area, a school zone or a shared zone, and where none of those applies it is the default limit (rules 21 to 25). The default is 50 km/h in a built-up area and 100 km/h elsewhere, unless another law provides otherwise (rule 25(2), (3)). A sign applies until the next different speed limit sign, an end speed limit or derestriction sign, or the end of the road at a T-intersection or dead end (rule 21(3)).

In Dinovitser v Police [2013] SASC 9, a conviction for 59 km/h under the 50 km/h default stood because the prosecution proved that no speed limit sign applied and the road was not in a speed limited area ([25], [41]).

A 25 km/h limit applies when passing a stopped school bus (section 82 of the Road Traffic Act) or a stopped breakdown services vehicle showing a flashing amber light (section 82A). In an emergency service speed zone the limit is 25 km/h, or less if needed to avoid danger (section 83). The expiation fees for those offences follow the rule 20 bands.

Buses over 5 tonnes and other vehicles over 12 tonnes gross vehicle mass are capped at 100 km/h where a sign shows more (rule 21(2)). Truck and bus speeding is covered on the heavy vehicle speeding page.

Learner’s permit and provisional licence holders must not exceed 100 km/h anywhere (sections 75A(16) and 81A(11) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 (SA)), and a condition of the permit or licence is that the holder must not exceed any limit by 10 km/h or more (sections 75A(10)(b) and 81A(4)(b)). Driving over 100 km/h, or contravening a provisional licence condition, carries a maximum fine of $1,250 (sections 75A(16), 81A(9) and 81A(11)).


What are the penalties for speeding offences in SA?

Speeding carries an expiation fee and demerit points fixed by how far over the limit the driver was, and the higher bands bring court penalties and licence loss. Fees are those in force from 1 July 2026 under Schedule 4 of the Road Traffic (Miscellaneous) Regulations 2014, and the points those in Schedule 4 of the Motor Vehicles Regulations 2025.

Speed over the limitOffenceExpiation feeDemerit points
Less than 10 km/hSpeeding (rule 20)$2152
10 km/h or more but less than 20 km/hSpeeding (rule 20)$4843
20 km/h or more but less than 30 km/hSpeeding (rule 20)$9875
30 km/h or moreSpeeding (rule 20)$1,7937
45 km/h or moreExcessive speed (section 45A)$2,018, or $2,098 for a road train on a prescribed road9
55 km/h or more over a limit of 60 km/h or less, or 80 km/h or more over a higher limitExtreme speed (section 19ADA)None fixed; the case goes to courtNone prescribed

A camera offence charged against the owner under section 79B carries the same fee as the speeding offence itself (Schedule 4, clause 2).

Excessive speed

On conviction, a first basic offence brings a fine of not less than $3,000 and not more than $5,000 and a disqualification of at least 6 months. An aggravated first offence, or a subsequent offence, carries up to 2 years imprisonment and at least 2 years disqualification. The disqualification cannot be reduced and cancels the licence (section 45A(1), (3)). See excessive speed.

Extreme speed

Since 16 December 2021, extreme speed has been a minor indictable offence under section 19ADA, with a maximum of 3 years imprisonment, or 5 years if aggravated, and no fine (section 5(3)(a)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1921 (SA)). A conviction brings a disqualification of at least 2 years, or 5 years for an aggravated or subsequent offence, that cannot be reduced (section 19ADA(5)). See extreme speed.

Dangerous driving

Speed alone can found a charge under section 46 of the Road Traffic Act, which carries 6 demerit points. In Police v Pimlott [2011] SASC 214, the driver was convicted after trial of driving at a speed dangerous to the public, detected by laser at 176 km/h, and on a police appeal the 12 month disqualification was increased to 18 months ([2] to [4], [20] to [21]). See driving at a speed dangerous.


Is a faulty speedometer a defence?

No. Speeding is an absolute liability offence, so an honest and reasonable belief that the car was under the limit is not a defence.

In Vandenbergh v Police [2005] SASC 197, the Supreme Court held that the speeding offences gave rise to absolute liability, so the defence of honest and reasonable mistake was not available ([33]). It would also have failed on the facts, because the driver knew his speedometer was unreliable and did nothing about it ([34], [39]). Jameson v Police [2016] SASC 5 says the same: “Speeding offences impose absolute liability and the defence of reasonable mistake of fact is not available” ([36]).

What can be challenged is the prosecution’s proof: whether the device was accurate and properly operated, whether the stated limit applied, and, for a camera notice, the owner’s exceptions. Those challenges are explained on contesting a speeding fine.


How do camera notices differ from a police stop?

When police stop a driver, the driver is given the notice or charged. When a camera detects the vehicle, the owner is guilty of an offence under section 79B(2) of the Road Traffic Act unless the owner proves an exception. Speeding under the Australian Road Rules is a prescribed offence for this purpose (regulation 30(2)(c) of the Road Traffic (Miscellaneous) Regulations 2014), and excessive speed is named in section 79B(1) itself.

The owner is not liable if the owner proves that no offence was in fact committed, or nominated the driver in the approved form within 28 days after the expiation notice (14 days after a reminder notice, or 28 days after a summons where no expiation notice was given), or does not know and could not by reasonable diligence have found out who was driving and has given the Commissioner of Police a statutory declaration with the reasons and the inquiries made (section 79B(2)). A false or misleading nomination carries a maximum penalty of $25,000 or 4 years imprisonment (section 79B(14)).

An owner who is a natural person incurs the demerit points prescribed for the speeding offence (section 98B(1aa) of the Motor Vehicles Act). If the driver is found guilty of, or expiates, the speeding offence, no one is liable for the owner offence, and the reverse also applies (section 79B(7), (8)).

The presumption does not lower the standard of proof. In Police v Schwerdt [2022] SASC 73, the Court said section 79B(2) creates a rebuttable presumption that the owner is responsible but does not change the elements, which the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt, ownership included ([33]).


What are the options on a speeding expiation notice?

There are three: pay the fee, apply for a review on the ground that the offence is trifling, or elect to be prosecuted.

The fee is due within 28 days from, and including, the date of the notice, not the date it arrives (section 6(1)(c) of the Expiation of Offences Act 1996 (SA)). If a notice arrives after that period, or never arrives, because of the authority’s error or a postal or email failure, the authority must withdraw it unless an amount has been paid (section 16(6), (7)).

A review under section 8A asks the issuing authority to withdraw the notice because the offence is trifling. The authority may ask for information verified by statutory declaration, and must withdraw the notice if satisfied the offence is trifling, but not once any amount has been paid (section 8A(2), (3), (5) and (6)).

An election to be prosecuted, on the form that must come with the notice, withdraws the notice for that offence, and the case is then decided in court (sections 6(1)(k), 8(1) and 8(3)). It cannot be made after a payment arrangement or an enforcement determination (section 8(2)).

Paying is not an admission of guilt and cannot be referred to in a report to a court for sentencing (section 15(4)). It still counts: demerit points are incurred on expiation as on conviction (section 98B(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act), and an expiated excessive speed or dangerous driving offence is a prior for 5 years (section 45A(4) of the Road Traffic Act). Choosing between the options is the subject of contesting a speeding fine.


How do demerit points work for speeding?

Demerit points are incurred on conviction for, or expiation of, a prescribed offence, in the number the regulations prescribe (section 98B(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act). Schedule 4 of the Motor Vehicles Regulations 2025 prescribes 2, 3, 5 or 7 points for speeding according to the band, 9 for excessive speed and 6 for dangerous driving under section 46(1). It prescribes none for extreme speed. Where several offences arise from one incident, points are incurred only for the offence carrying the most, except that a red light offence and a speeding offence from the same incident both count (section 98B(3), (3a)).

Incurring 12 or more points for offences within 3 years brings a disqualification of 3 months for 12 to 15 points, 4 months for 16 to 19, and 5 months for 20 or more (section 98BC). A licence holder given a notice under section 98BD(2) can elect instead, within 21 days (28 days with permission), to accept a 12 month good behaviour condition, but 2 or more points while it applies brings twice the disqualification (section 98BE(2), (2a)). In Bialobrzeski v Police [2016] SASC 99, a further 3 points on the condition doubled the disqualification to 6 months ([2], [4]).

A court can order fewer points, or none, only when it convicts, and only if satisfied by evidence on oath given immediately on conviction that the offence is trifling or that other proper cause exists (section 98B(4)). The power is not available on expiation. A driver who elects and pleads guilty, even as a plea of convenience, incurs the points unless that order is made (Jameson at [38]), and a decision not to record a conviction does not avoid them (Heyne v Police [2019] SASC 52 at [42]). A typical offence of 15 km/h over is not trifling, and proper cause must come from the offence, not the offender (Jameson at [41] to [44]), so personal hardship does not count (Commissioner of Police v Ellis [2024] SASC 87 at [13] to [16]). The application is covered on demerit point reduction.

A sentencing court must not take into account that demerit points will follow from the conviction (section 98BH).


What happens to learners and P-platers caught speeding?

A learner or provisional driver who is 10 km/h or more over the limit, or who reaches 4 demerit points, is disqualified for 6 months and loses the permit or licence. Exceeding a limit by 10 km/h or more contravenes a condition of the permit or licence (sections 75A(10)(b) and 81A(4)(b)).

When the holder of a learner’s permit, provisional licence or probationary licence commits or expiates an offence of contravening a condition, or points recorded while holding a learner’s permit or provisional licence reach 4 or more (2 or more on a probationary licence), the Registrar of Motor Vehicles must give written notice that the holder is disqualified for 6 months and that the permit or licence is cancelled (section 81B(1)). The duty arises on becoming aware of the offence and is to be carried out with all convenient speed (Helbers v Registrar of Motor Vehicles [2012] SASC 185 at [55], [64]).

A provisional licence holder is entitled to enter a Safer Driver Agreement in place of the disqualification, by notice to the Registrar within 21 days of the day specified in the disqualification notice (28 days with the Registrar’s permission), unless the offence is a serious disqualification offence or the driver has entered an agreement, or had a section 81B appeal allowed, in the previous 5 years (section 81BA(1), (2)). A serious disqualification offence includes any offence attracting 4 or more demerit points, so speeding by 20 km/h or more, and a speeding offence attracting 3 or more points where the holder has already been convicted of or expiated another such offence while holding the same licence (section 81BA(6)). The choice is compared on Safer Driver Agreement or licence appeal.

Holding a learner’s permit, provisional licence or probationary licence also makes excessive speed an aggravated offence (section 45A(4a)(b)(vii) of the Road Traffic Act), and does the same for extreme speed (section 5AA(1d)(b)(iv) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act). P plate speeding and the licence appeal are covered on P plate speeding licence appeal and drivers licence appeal.


When can police take a licence on the spot?

For excessive speed and for extreme speed. Each has its own police notice, which suspends the licence of a licence holder and disqualifies a driver who holds no licence.

Excessive speed notices (section 45B)

A police officer who reasonably believes a person has committed excessive speed may give a notice of licence disqualification or suspension (section 45B(1)(a), (2)), and a notice may also follow a camera expiation notice given to the owner (section 45B(1)(b)). An officer’s notice takes effect when given, or 48 hours later if postponed; a camera-based notice takes effect 28 days after it is given. It ends when the case is decided, withdrawn or discontinued, and at the latest after 6 months (section 45B(10)).

Only the camera-based notice can be taken to the Magistrates Court under section 47IAB. The Commissioner of Police may withdraw any section 45B notice given in error, defective, or that should not have been given for other proper cause (section 45B(13)). On a conviction, the court must take the notice period into account and may go below the minimum disqualification by that time (section 45B(7)).

Extreme speed notices (section 19AF)

A police officer who reasonably believes a person has committed extreme speed may give a notice under section 19AF of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act. It takes effect when given and ends on a court order, a decision not to charge, or the end of the case, and at the latest after 12 months (section 19AF(17)). A court can end it early only if satisfied, on evidence on oath, that exceptional circumstances exist and that the person does not pose a substantial risk to other members of the public (section 19AF(6)).

Driving during either notice is an offence with a maximum of 12 months imprisonment for a first offence (section 91(5a) of the Motor Vehicles Act). The court applications are explained on immediate loss of licence appeal.


What happens if a speeding charge goes to court?

A magistrate decides the case. A breach of the Australian Road Rules is a summary offence (Moran v Police [2010] SASC 269 at [12]), and the maximum fine for a speeding offence under the Rules is $5,000 (regulation 67(a) of the Road Traffic (Road Rules-Ancillary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2014).

A conviction for a summary offence attracts a victims of crime levy of $287, against $108 for an expiated summary offence (Schedule 1 of the Victims of Crime (Fund and Levy) Regulations 2018), and can bring prosecution costs and court fees (Ellis at [33]). The demerit points are the same either way, and a reduction under section 98B(4) is possible only after a conviction.

Police must commence the prosecution within 6 months after the expiation period on the notice ends, or within 6 months of the offence if no notice was given (section 52(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act).


How similar cases tend to play out

Three illustrations of how rule 20 and the related provisions apply on ordinary facts. They are not predictions. The result depends on the evidence, the person’s history and the court.

Lower range. A fixed camera records a car at 57 km/h in a 50 km/h zone. The owner receives an expiation notice for the owner offence under section 79B(2): $215 and 2 demerit points. If someone else was driving, the owner can nominate that person within 28 days (section 79B(2)(b)), and the authority can then withdraw the notice and give one to the driver (section 16(1)(ab), (12) of the Expiation of Offences Act).

Middle range. A provisional licence holder is stopped by police at 76 km/h in a 60 km/h zone: $484 and 3 demerit points, which alone stay below the 4 point threshold. Being 16 km/h over also contravenes the provisional licence condition (section 81A(4)(b)), so once that offence is committed or expiated the Registrar must disqualify the driver for 6 months and cancel the licence (section 81B(1)). Unless the driver has been disqualified before, has a previous speeding offence of 3 or more points on the same licence, or has had an agreement or a successful appeal in the past 5 years, a Safer Driver Agreement can be elected instead (section 81BA).

Upper range. A driver alone in the car is detected by police laser at 108 km/h in a 60 km/h zone, 48 km/h over. That is excessive speed (section 45A), and the officer can suspend the licence on the spot (section 45B). The expiation fee is $2,018 with 9 demerit points; a conviction for a first basic offence brings a fine of $3,000 to $5,000 and at least 6 months disqualification, with credit for time under the notice (section 45B(7)). At 115 km/h it would be extreme speed (section 19ADA).


How we defend a speeding charge

Most speeding cases turn on the measurement, the limit, the identity of the driver and the points. We look at each of them before advising whether to pay, seek a review or elect.

StageWhat happensWhat we do
NoticeAn expiation notice arrives, or police report the driver for a charge.Check the dates, the offence described and the speed band, and work out the points position.
DecisionPay, seek a review, nominate the driver or elect.Advise on each option before the 28 days run out.
DisclosurePhotographs, certificates, device and testing records.Test them against sections 79B(10) and 175(3).
Hearing or pleaThe Magistrates Court hears the case or takes a plea.Run the defence, or negotiate the charge and the facts.
Penalty and pointsFine, any disqualification and the demerit points.Make any section 98B(4) application, and seek credit for any police notice.

We cannot promise a particular result, and no lawyer can. We can make sure the prosecution proves its case, and that a driver chooses between paying and electing knowing what each costs in points and licence time.

Every hour matters. Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation, or call (08) 7094 2021 now.


Speeding case law

These are the decisions this guide relies on. The case notes state what each court decided.

CaseCourtPrinciplePinpoint
Police v Young [2012] SASC 210Supreme CourtRule 20 applies to speeding however it is detected[121] to [125]
Dinovitser v Police [2013] SASC 9Supreme CourtThe 50 km/h default applied where no sign or area limit applied[25], [41]
Vandenbergh v Police [2005] SASC 197Supreme CourtSpeeding is an absolute liability offence[33] to [34], [39]
Jameson v Police [2016] SASC 5Supreme CourtAbsolute liability; points follow a guilty plea unless a section 98B(4) order is made[36], [38], [41] to [44]
Moran v Police [2010] SASC 269Supreme CourtA breach of the Australian Road Rules is a summary offence for a magistrate[12]
Police v Schwerdt [2022] SASC 73Supreme CourtThe owner presumption does not change the elements the prosecution must prove[33]
Heyne v Police [2019] SASC 52Supreme CourtNot recording a conviction does not avoid demerit points[40] to [42]
Commissioner of Police v Ellis [2024] SASC 87Supreme CourtProper cause relates to the offence; hardship does not count[13] to [16], [33]
Bialobrzeski v Police [2016] SASC 99Supreme CourtPoints during a good behaviour condition doubled the disqualification[2], [4]
Helbers v Registrar of Motor Vehicles [2012] SASC 185Supreme CourtThe Registrar acts under section 81B on becoming aware of the offence[55], [64]
Police v Pimlott [2011] SASC 214Supreme Court176 km/h as dangerous driving; disqualification increased to 18 months[2] to [4], [13], [20] to [21]

Case notes

Police v Young [2012] SASC 210

Rule 20 applies to any speeding however it is detected; the regulations’ definition of a speeding offence does not confine it to offences detected by photographic equipment ([121] to [125]). The appeal was dismissed ([127]).

Dinovitser v Police [2013] SASC 9

A camera recorded the car at 59 km/h. The prosecution proved that no speed limit sign applied and that the road was not in a speed limited area, so the 50 km/h default applied ([25], [41]). The appeal was dismissed ([42]).

Vandenbergh v Police [2005] SASC 197

The speeding offences gave rise to absolute liability, so honest and reasonable mistake was not available ([33]). It would have failed on the facts anyway, because the driver knew his speedometer was unreliable ([34], [39]).

Jameson v Police [2016] SASC 5

A driver detected 15 km/h over elected to be prosecuted, pleaded guilty and incurred 3 demerit points ([2], [14], [42]). The Court said speeding offences impose absolute liability ([36]), that a guilty plea of convenience still incurs the points unless a section 98B(4) order is made ([38]), and that a typical 15 km/h offence is not trifling ([41] to [44]).

Moran v Police [2010] SASC 269

A breach of the Australian Road Rules is a summary offence, so a hearing before a magistrate was appropriate ([12]). The appeal was dismissed ([26]).

Police v Schwerdt [2022] SASC 73

An owner given a notice for 110 km/h in a 90 km/h zone elected to be prosecuted, and the information mistyped the registration number, which is not an element ([3], [28] to [29]). Section 79B(2) creates a rebuttable presumption that the owner is responsible but leaves every element, ownership included, to be proved beyond reasonable doubt ([33]).

Heyne v Police [2019] SASC 52

In two camera speeding appeals, proper cause was confined to the circumstances of the offence ([20], [26]), and the demerit points followed from the guilty plea under section 98B(1) whether or not a conviction was recorded ([40] to [42]). On the police cross-appeal, convictions were recorded ([51]).

Commissioner of Police v Ellis [2024] SASC 87

A driver detected at 105 km/h in an 80 km/h zone faced a demerit point disqualification, and the magistrate reduced the points for proper cause ([6] to [7], [10]). Proper cause must relate to the offence, not the offender, so personal hardship to the driver, the family or others cannot count; the reduction was set aside ([13] to [16], [33]).

Bialobrzeski v Police [2016] SASC 99

A driver on a good behaviour condition incurred a further 3 points, which doubled the disqualification to 6 months ([2], [4]). The appeal was dismissed ([29]).

Helbers v Registrar of Motor Vehicles [2012] SASC 185

The Registrar’s duty under section 81B arises on becoming aware of the offence, and where no time is fixed the step must be taken with all convenient speed ([55], [64]).

Police v Pimlott [2011] SASC 214

The respondent was convicted after trial of driving at a speed dangerous to the public, detected by laser at 176 km/h ([2] to [4]). Grossly excessive speed calls for deterrence ([13]), and the 12 month minimum disqualification the magistrate imposed was increased to 18 months ([15], [20] to [21]).


Frequently asked questions

How much is a speeding fine in SA?

From 1 July 2026 the expiation fee is $215 for less than 10 km/h over, $484 for 10 km/h or more but less than 20 km/h, $987 for 20 km/h or more but less than 30 km/h, and $1,793 for 30 km/h or more (Road Traffic (Miscellaneous) Regulations 2014, Schedule 4). Excessive speed, 45 km/h or more over, has a fee of $2,018.

How many demerit points do I lose for speeding?

Two points for less than 10 km/h over, 3 for 10 km/h or more but less than 20 km/h, 5 for 20 km/h or more but less than 30 km/h, and 7 for 30 km/h or more. Excessive speed carries 9 points (Motor Vehicles Regulations 2025, Schedule 4).

How many demerit points before I lose my licence in SA?

Twelve or more points for offences within 3 years brings a disqualification of 3, 4 or 5 months depending on the total (section 98BC of the Motor Vehicles Act). A 12 month good behaviour condition can be elected instead, but 2 or more points during it doubles the disqualification (section 98BE). Learners and provisional drivers are disqualified at 4 points (section 81B).

Does paying a speeding fine mean I admit guilt?

No. Expiation is not an admission of guilt and cannot be referred to in a report to a sentencing court (section 15(4) of the Expiation of Offences Act). The demerit points are still incurred, and an expiated excessive speed offence counts as a prior for 5 years.

What if I was not driving when the camera caught my car?

The owner can nominate the driver, in the approved form, within 28 days after the expiation notice (section 79B(2)(b) of the Road Traffic Act). An owner who could not identify the driver by reasonable diligence can instead give a statutory declaration with the reasons and the inquiries made (section 79B(2)(c)). A false nomination carries up to $25,000 or 4 years imprisonment.

What happens if I am caught speeding on my P plates?

Going 10 km/h or more over any limit contravenes a provisional licence condition, and the Registrar must then disqualify the driver for 6 months and cancel the licence (sections 81A(4)(b) and 81B(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act). Reaching 4 demerit points has the same result. For an offence carrying fewer than 4 points, a Safer Driver Agreement may be available instead, elected within 21 days (section 81BA).

Can police take my licence on the spot for speeding?

Yes, for excessive speed under section 45B of the Road Traffic Act, for up to 6 months, and for extreme speed under section 19AF of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act, for up to 12 months. Driving during the notice carries up to 12 months imprisonment for a first offence (section 91(5a) of the Motor Vehicles Act).

Is speeding a criminal offence in SA?

Speeding under rule 20 is a summary offence heard by a magistrate, and an expiation notice can be given for it. Extreme speed under section 19ADA of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act is a minor indictable offence punishable by imprisonment.

Can I get my demerit points reduced?

Only if convicted. A court can order fewer or no points if satisfied, on evidence on oath given immediately on conviction, that the offence is trifling or that other proper cause exists (section 98B(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act). Hardship from losing the licence does not count (Ellis at [16]).

What is the maximum fine for speeding in court?

Up to $5,000 for a speeding offence under the Australian Road Rules (regulation 67(a) of the Road Traffic (Road Rules-Ancillary and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2014).

Do I need a lawyer for a speeding offence?

Not always. When the points or the licence are at risk, or the speed was 45 km/h or more over, the choice between paying and electing has lasting effects. We can advise on the evidence and the options before the 28 days run out. Call (08) 7094 2021.


South Australian courts we attend for speeding offences

We defend speeding and excessive speed charges in the Adelaide Magistrates Court and the suburban and regional Magistrates Courts listed below.

Book a same-day free 30-minute consultation or call (08) 7094 2021.


Talon Legal Insights

Access hundreds of legal precedents and templates.

When you partner with us, you also gain access to a vast repository of regularly updated and ever-expanding legal resources.